Электронная коммерция в России и за рубежом: правовое регулирование

Personal Jurisdiction on the Internet: An Outline for the Perplexed // Temple University Law School. June 1998. http://www.temple.edu/lawschool/dpost/outline.htm

89

Black’s Law Dictionary. 9

ed. 2011. Thomson Reuters. P. 929.

90

Ibid. P. 931.

91

Jack H. Friedenthal et al. Civil Procedure. 2

ed. 1993. § 2.1; Charles Wright. The Law of Federal Courts. 5

ed. 1994. § 42.

92

28 U.S.C. § 1391(d). Brunette Mach. Works, Ltd v. Kockum Indus., Inc., 406 U.S.

93

Black’s Law Dictionary. 9

ed. 2011. Thomson West. P. 1519.

94

Black’s Law Dictionary. 9

ed. 2011. Thomson West. P. 1027.

95

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/United_States_Code/Title_28/Appendix/Federal_Rules_ of_Civil_Procedure/Rule_4

96

Детальный анализ законов процессуальных законов штатов в этой части см.: David Thatch. Personal Jurisdiction and the World-Wide Web: Bits (and Bytes) of Minimum Contacts // Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal.

97

См., например: New York Civil Practice Law. § 302.

98

См.: Ward Classen. A Practical Guide to Software Licensing for Licensees and Licensors. ABA Publishing, 2008. P. 212.

99

Cardozo B. The Growth of the Law. Yale University Press, 1924. P. 9.

100

Freiheit J. Proskauer on International Litigation and Arbitration: Ch. 7 Choice of Law Issues. Selecting the Appropriate Law. www.proskauerguide.

101

Symeonides S. Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2006: Twentieth Annual Survey // American Journal of Comparative Law. 2006. № 54. P. 697, 712.

102

Intellectual Property: Principles Governing Jurisdiction, Choice of Law and Judgments in Transnational Disputes. American Institute of Law. Proposed final draft, 2007. Reporter’s Мemorandum. P. XIX.

103

ALI Principles of the Law of Software Contracts. Proposed Final Draft, 2009.

104

См. детальный перечень в § 423 Restatement 3d of Foreign Relations Law, § 27 Restatement Second on Conflict of Laws.

105

In re Ski Train Fire in Kaprun, Austria on Nov. 11. 2000. 342 F. Supp. 2d 207 (S.D.N.Y., 2004).

106

Соответствующее толкование было дано положениям V и XIV поправок к Конституции США, образующим Due Process Clause Верховным судом США в деле International Shoe v. Washington 326 U.S. 310 (1945).